Blog

Luis Majano

October 05, 2009

Spread the word


Share your thoughts

We always are trying to help the ColdFusion community as much as we can.  We had a CFC best practices document in our ColdBox documentation site in order to steer developers in the right direction when building components.  I have updated the document to now include more topics than just CFCs.  So if you are interested in collaborating to this document or think some points are useless, please comment and we can make this document better.

So here are our ColdFusion Development Best Practices document: http://ortus.svnrepository.com/coldbox/trac.cgi/wiki/cbDevelopmentBestPractices

Add Your Comment

(6)

Oct 06, 2009 03:20:57 UTC

by dickbob

Some interesting thoughts although you'll never get *everyone* to agree with *all* of them :-) It might be nice to include some justification to the reccomendations. For example I understand but don't like... ...as len() doesn't return a boolean. Discuss...

Oct 06, 2009 06:41:46 UTC

by Peter Boughton

Heh, I haven't even got past the first screen, and I already disagree with half of it! The only one I'll explicitly state here is that "regex" is significantly more common (and less typing) than "regexp".

Oct 06, 2009 07:29:10 UTC

by Tony Garcia

I use code like all the time. It's just shorter than writing And the intent of the code is very clear to me. I'm not hung up on that len() doesn't return a boolean (even though it acts like it does), since CF is loosely typed anyway. I think a lof of these types of things just come down to personal preferences. The important thing is that you should have standard coding practices (whatever they may be) and stick to them.

Oct 06, 2009 09:21:08 UTC

by dickbob

@Tony - Be careful you don't end up on Sean's DNH list :-) From his "ColdFusion MX Coding Guidelines - Good Practice" doc http://livedocs.adobe.com/wtg/public/coding_standards/goodpractice.html he says "...don't rely on implicit conversions from numeric types to boolean". But you're right, it's a personal style thing and any standard is better than none.

Oct 06, 2009 11:23:43 UTC

by Tony Garcia

@dickbob Yikes! I'll try to be careful. Thanks for the heads up! ;-)

Mar 25, 2019 02:23:25 UTC

by Enterprise Software Solutions

Your post was very nicely written, Thank you.

Recent Entries

BoxLang 1.0.0 Beta 7 Launched

BoxLang 1.0.0 Beta 7 Launched

We are pleased to announce the release of BoxLang 1.0.0-Beta 7! This latest beta version includes improvements and essential bug fixes, but more importantly it certifies the execution of ColdBox HMVC and TestBox.

What is BoxLang?

BoxLang is a modern dynamic JVM language that can be deployed on multiple runtimes: operating system (Windows/Mac/*nix/Embedded), web server, lambda, iOS, android, web assembly, and more. BoxLang combines many features from different progr

Luis Majano
Luis Majano
July 26, 2024
New BoxLang Feature: Java Method References and Higher-Order Functions

New BoxLang Feature: Java Method References and Higher-Order Functions

We’ve added more goodies to our BoxLang Java interop: method references and higher-order functions. CFML has never let you do these things, making Java Interop feel like a second-class citizen. But with BoxLang, we’re elevating Java integration to a new level.

Maria Jose Herrera
Maria Jose Herrera
July 26, 2024
Level Up Your ColdFusion Skills with our Virtual Live Training: ColdBox from Zero to Hero

Level Up Your ColdFusion Skills with our Virtual Live Training: ColdBox from Zero to Hero

Level Up Your ColdFusion Skills with our Virtual Live Training: ColdBox from Zero to Hero

Are you a CFML developer looking to take your skills to the next level? Look no further than the ColdBox from Zero to Hero Virtual Live Training! This intensive two-day course will equip you with the knowledge and expertise to build robust and scalable applications using ColdBox 7, the latest version of the most popular CFML MVC framework.

What You'll Learn:

  • Master the Fun...

Cristobal Escobar
Cristobal Escobar
July 24, 2024