Blog

ColdBox 2.1.0 wishlist, what do you want?

Luis Majano October 15, 2008

Spread the word

Luis Majano

October 15, 2008

Spread the word


Share your thoughts

As ColdBox has gathered steam and continues to do so, development for the 2.1.0 release has already begun. We are also in need of your observations and suggestions. We have gotten several wishlists and feature requests that will be implemented for version 2.1.0

Add Your Comment

(11)

Aug 17, 2007 20:41:41 UTC

by Tim

http://code.google.com/p/litepost/ A ColdBox version.

Aug 20, 2007 14:53:45 UTC

by Damien McKenna

SES. Any chance of moving it back from 2.3? I can probably write a .htaccess file for you to remove the need for the whole "index.cfm/go/my/page" part and have it simply do "my/page", if you'd like?

Aug 20, 2007 21:26:09 UTC

by Dave

I second the SES, without the need need to type index.cfm/.

Aug 21, 2007 01:35:00 UTC

by Luis Majano

I think both approaches can be done. One with the front controller and the other one by pure web server rewrite

Aug 21, 2007 09:10:32 UTC

by Damien McKenna

Any plans for an official ORM?

Aug 21, 2007 12:54:03 UTC

by Luis Majano

Not really, it is so easy to use Transfer or Object Breeze or Reactor with ColdBox, that it just doesn't make sense for me to delve into building an ORM. My personal choice is Transfer, I have been using it for a while now and don't see why I would ever want to create one.

Aug 28, 2007 10:35:22 UTC

by John

How about adding the File Browser from the Dashboard as a plugin?

Sep 07, 2007 07:32:18 UTC

by Dave

Handling form data like this: http://www.briankotek.com/blog/index.cfm/2007/9/4/Implicit-Creation-of-Arrays-and-Structures-from-Form-Fields It would be really neat to be able to pass arrays and structs based on the input names. -Dave

Sep 07, 2007 12:29:40 UTC

by Luis Majano

That is very interesting Dave, it could be a great addition to the beanFactory as an implicit manipulation. Maybe a setting in your application that activates complex form fields. Do you think that having a setting to turn this ON/OFF would be a good idea?

Sep 07, 2007 20:46:34 UTC

by Dave

You would need to have a on/off setting I would think or it would break backwards-compatibility. -Dave

Sep 08, 2007 11:20:05 UTC

by Dave

Having had sometime to think on it... I would think that add a new function or argument to the event scope might be better then an on/off setting... Such as: event.getCollection('Implicit') or event.getImplicitCollection that way it wouldn't be an all or nothing thing and you could use it when the situation suited you. -Dave

Recent Entries

The 12 Days of Christmas - ITB 2022 Video Release— Day 2 - New Modules

The 12 Days of Christmas - ITB 2022 Video Release— Day 2 - New Modules

It's that time of year again. Trees are lit, presents are being wrapped, and relatives are coming to visit. That's right, it's time again for the 12 days of Christmas-- 2022 ITB Video Release Edition! 

Today, Day 2's Videos from Into the Box 2022 Conference, are all newly announced modules.

Gavin Pickin
Gavin Pickin
December 09, 2022
The 12 Days of Christmas - ITB 2022 Video Release— Day 1

The 12 Days of Christmas - ITB 2022 Video Release— Day 1

It's that time of year again.  Trees are lit, presents are being wrapped, and relatives are coming to visit.  That's right, it's time again for the 12 days of Christmas-- 2022 ITB Video Release Edition!

For the next 12 business days up until Christmas, we'll be releasing a series of related videos each day on the CFCasts site for our CFCasts Subscribers, and a announcement with titles, descriptions, and links to the videos, right here on the Ortus blog.  Consider it our early Christmas gift to you.

Gavin Pickin
Gavin Pickin
December 08, 2022
CommandBox Docker v3.6.3 Images Released

CommandBox Docker v3.6.3 Images Released

CommandBox 3.6.3 Docker images released



Today we are pleased to announce the release of version 3.6.3 of our CommandBox Docker images, which contains significant upgrades to the underlying CommandBox engine.

Most significantly, this release upgrades the CommandBox binary to 5.7.0. Read the Release Notes for this version here. This image version also adds new distro builds for the RHEL Universal Base Image. These images may be utilized by using the ubi9 in the image tag in the same way the alpine base images currently do.

Jon Clausen
Jon Clausen
December 08, 2022