Blog
Recent Entries
Introducing BoxLang AI: Build Intelligent Applications with One Unified AI Platform
Artificial intelligence is opening new possibilities for web applications, but building those experiences can become complicated quickly. Each AI provider brings its own SDK, authentication process, APIs, and model-specific requirements. Add agents, memory, tools, structured responses, or document retrieval, and development teams can find themselves managing integrations instead of improving their applications.
Introduced at Into the Box 2026, BoxLang AI gives developers a more unified way to build AI-powered applications within the BoxLang ecosystem.
bx-toml : Native TOML Support for BoxLang
TOML has quietly become the configuration format of the modern toolchain. Rust ships Cargo.toml, Python ships pyproject.toml, and a growing pile of CLIs, deployment platforms, and infrastructure tools expect it. If your BoxLang application needs to read one of those files, or generate one, you now have first class support for it.
BoxLang 1.16.0 Released!
BoxLang 1.16.0 is here, closing 50 issues across new features, improvements, and bug fixes. The theme running through this release is control: control over how HTTP clients are created and reused, control over what happens when a request fails, control over how much data a response is allowed to buffer, control over when Java classpaths reload, and tighter alignment with CFML behavior in the edge cases that only show up in production.
Add Your Comment
(11)
Aug 17, 2007 20:41:41 UTC
by Tim
http://code.google.com/p/litepost/
A ColdBox version.
Aug 20, 2007 14:53:45 UTC
by Damien McKenna
SES. Any chance of moving it back from 2.3? I can probably write a .htaccess file for you to remove the need for the whole part and have it simply do , if you'd like?
Aug 20, 2007 21:26:09 UTC
by Dave
I second the SES, without the need need to type index.cfm/.
Aug 21, 2007 01:35:00 UTC
by Luis Majano
I think both approaches can be done. One with the front controller and the other one by pure web server rewrite
Aug 21, 2007 09:10:32 UTC
by Damien McKenna
Any plans for an official ORM?
Aug 21, 2007 12:54:03 UTC
by Luis Majano
Not really, it is so easy to use Transfer or Object Breeze or Reactor with ColdBox, that it just doesn't make sense for me to delve into building an ORM. My personal choice is Transfer, I have been using it for a while now and don't see why I would ever want to create one.
Aug 28, 2007 10:35:22 UTC
by John
How about adding the File Browser from the Dashboard as a plugin?
Sep 07, 2007 07:32:18 UTC
by Dave
Handling form data like this:
http://www.briankotek.com/blog/index.cfm/2007/9/4/Implicit-Creation-of-Arrays-and-Structures-from-Form-Fields
It would be really neat to be able to pass arrays and structs based on the input names.
-Dave
Sep 07, 2007 12:29:40 UTC
by Luis Majano
That is very interesting Dave, it could be a great addition to the beanFactory as an implicit manipulation. Maybe a setting in your application that activates complex form fields. Do you think that having a setting to turn this ON/OFF would be a good idea?
Sep 07, 2007 20:46:34 UTC
by Dave
You would need to have a on/off setting I would think or it would break backwards-compatibility.
-Dave
Sep 08, 2007 11:20:05 UTC
by Dave
Having had sometime to think on it... I would think that add a new function or argument to the event scope might be better then an on/off setting... Such as:
event.getCollection('Implicit')
or
event.getImplicitCollection
that way it wouldn't be an all or nothing thing and you could use it when the situation suited you.
-Dave