Blog

ColdBox 2.1.0 wishlist, what do you want?

Luis Majano October 15, 2008

Spread the word

Luis Majano

October 15, 2008

Spread the word


Share your thoughts

As ColdBox has gathered steam and continues to do so, development for the 2.1.0 release has already begun. We are also in need of your observations and suggestions. We have gotten several wishlists and feature requests that will be implemented for version 2.1.0

Add Your Comment

(11)

Aug 17, 2007 20:41:41 UTC

by Tim

http://code.google.com/p/litepost/ A ColdBox version.

Aug 20, 2007 14:53:45 UTC

by Damien McKenna

SES. Any chance of moving it back from 2.3? I can probably write a .htaccess file for you to remove the need for the whole "index.cfm/go/my/page" part and have it simply do "my/page", if you'd like?

Aug 20, 2007 21:26:09 UTC

by Dave

I second the SES, without the need need to type index.cfm/.

Aug 21, 2007 01:35:00 UTC

by Luis Majano

I think both approaches can be done. One with the front controller and the other one by pure web server rewrite

Aug 21, 2007 09:10:32 UTC

by Damien McKenna

Any plans for an official ORM?

Aug 21, 2007 12:54:03 UTC

by Luis Majano

Not really, it is so easy to use Transfer or Object Breeze or Reactor with ColdBox, that it just doesn't make sense for me to delve into building an ORM. My personal choice is Transfer, I have been using it for a while now and don't see why I would ever want to create one.

Aug 28, 2007 10:35:22 UTC

by John

How about adding the File Browser from the Dashboard as a plugin?

Sep 07, 2007 07:32:18 UTC

by Dave

Handling form data like this: http://www.briankotek.com/blog/index.cfm/2007/9/4/Implicit-Creation-of-Arrays-and-Structures-from-Form-Fields It would be really neat to be able to pass arrays and structs based on the input names. -Dave

Sep 07, 2007 12:29:40 UTC

by Luis Majano

That is very interesting Dave, it could be a great addition to the beanFactory as an implicit manipulation. Maybe a setting in your application that activates complex form fields. Do you think that having a setting to turn this ON/OFF would be a good idea?

Sep 07, 2007 20:46:34 UTC

by Dave

You would need to have a on/off setting I would think or it would break backwards-compatibility. -Dave

Sep 08, 2007 11:20:05 UTC

by Dave

Having had sometime to think on it... I would think that add a new function or argument to the event scope might be better then an on/off setting... Such as: event.getCollection('Implicit') or event.getImplicitCollection that way it wouldn't be an all or nothing thing and you could use it when the situation suited you. -Dave

Recent Entries

Hackers demand a ransom to restore data from my ColdFusion web applications!

Hackers demand a ransom to restore data from my ColdFusion web applications!

Hackers demand a ransom to restore data from my ColdFusion web applications!

Unfortunately, we often hear this message from clients who thought it would never happen to them... until it did. Some believed they could delay the expense of Implementing ColdFusion security best practices for one year, while others were tempted to put it off for just a few months. However, in today's rapidly evolving digital landscape, the security of web applications, including ColdFusio...

Cristobal Escobar
Cristobal Escobar
April 16, 2024
Ortus March Newsletter

Ortus March Newsletter

Welcome to Ortus Solutions’ monthly roundup, where we're thrilled to showcase cutting-edge advancements, product updates, and exciting events! Join us as we delve into the latest innovations shaping the future of technology.

Maria Jose Herrera
Maria Jose Herrera
April 01, 2024
Into the Box 2024 Last Early Bird Days!

Into the Box 2024 Last Early Bird Days!

Time is ticking, with less than 60 days remaining until the excitement of Into the Box 2024 unfolds! Don't let this golden opportunity slip away; our exclusive Early Bird Pricing is here for a limited time only, available until March 31st. Why wait? Secure your seat now and take advantage of this steal!

Maria Jose Herrera
Maria Jose Herrera
March 20, 2024