Blog
Recent Entries
ContentBox v6.1 Released
In this release, we're thrilled to unveil a series of significant enhancements and upgrades to ContentBox designed to elevate your experience and considerably improve system performance. Our team has focused on integrating the latest CommandBox migrations and ColdBox Core, which ensures that the core system continues to operate with maximum efficiency and stability. This upgrade is part of our ongoing commitment to maintaining a cutting-edge platform that meets the evolving needs of our users.
Introducing BoxLang Gen AI: A Unified API for Large Language Models
We are thrilled to introduce BoxLang Gen AI, a powerful and intuitive module that brings seamless AI generation capabilities to your BoxLang applications. With a fluent, functional API, this module allows developers to interact with multiple AI providers in a consistent and abstracted manner.
Add Your Comment
(11)
Aug 17, 2007 20:41:41 UTC
by Tim
http://code.google.com/p/litepost/ A ColdBox version.
Aug 20, 2007 14:53:45 UTC
by Damien McKenna
SES. Any chance of moving it back from 2.3? I can probably write a .htaccess file for you to remove the need for the whole "index.cfm/go/my/page" part and have it simply do "my/page", if you'd like?
Aug 20, 2007 21:26:09 UTC
by Dave
I second the SES, without the need need to type index.cfm/.
Aug 21, 2007 01:35:00 UTC
by Luis Majano
I think both approaches can be done. One with the front controller and the other one by pure web server rewrite
Aug 21, 2007 09:10:32 UTC
by Damien McKenna
Any plans for an official ORM?
Aug 21, 2007 12:54:03 UTC
by Luis Majano
Not really, it is so easy to use Transfer or Object Breeze or Reactor with ColdBox, that it just doesn't make sense for me to delve into building an ORM. My personal choice is Transfer, I have been using it for a while now and don't see why I would ever want to create one.
Aug 28, 2007 10:35:22 UTC
by John
How about adding the File Browser from the Dashboard as a plugin?
Sep 07, 2007 07:32:18 UTC
by Dave
Handling form data like this: http://www.briankotek.com/blog/index.cfm/2007/9/4/Implicit-Creation-of-Arrays-and-Structures-from-Form-Fields It would be really neat to be able to pass arrays and structs based on the input names. -Dave
Sep 07, 2007 12:29:40 UTC
by Luis Majano
That is very interesting Dave, it could be a great addition to the beanFactory as an implicit manipulation. Maybe a setting in your application that activates complex form fields. Do you think that having a setting to turn this ON/OFF would be a good idea?
Sep 07, 2007 20:46:34 UTC
by Dave
You would need to have a on/off setting I would think or it would break backwards-compatibility. -Dave
Sep 08, 2007 11:20:05 UTC
by Dave
Having had sometime to think on it... I would think that add a new function or argument to the event scope might be better then an on/off setting... Such as: event.getCollection('Implicit') or event.getImplicitCollection that way it wouldn't be an all or nothing thing and you could use it when the situation suited you. -Dave