Blog

ColdBox 2.1.0 wishlist, what do you want?

Luis Majano October 15, 2008

Spread the word

Luis Majano

October 15, 2008

Spread the word


Share your thoughts

As ColdBox has gathered steam and continues to do so, development for the 2.1.0 release has already begun. We are also in need of your observations and suggestions. We have gotten several wishlists and feature requests that will be implemented for version 2.1.0

Add Your Comment

(11)

Aug 17, 2007 20:41:41 UTC

by Tim

http://code.google.com/p/litepost/ A ColdBox version.

Aug 20, 2007 14:53:45 UTC

by Damien McKenna

SES. Any chance of moving it back from 2.3? I can probably write a .htaccess file for you to remove the need for the whole "index.cfm/go/my/page" part and have it simply do "my/page", if you'd like?

Aug 20, 2007 21:26:09 UTC

by Dave

I second the SES, without the need need to type index.cfm/.

Aug 21, 2007 01:35:00 UTC

by Luis Majano

I think both approaches can be done. One with the front controller and the other one by pure web server rewrite

Aug 21, 2007 09:10:32 UTC

by Damien McKenna

Any plans for an official ORM?

Aug 21, 2007 12:54:03 UTC

by Luis Majano

Not really, it is so easy to use Transfer or Object Breeze or Reactor with ColdBox, that it just doesn't make sense for me to delve into building an ORM. My personal choice is Transfer, I have been using it for a while now and don't see why I would ever want to create one.

Aug 28, 2007 10:35:22 UTC

by John

How about adding the File Browser from the Dashboard as a plugin?

Sep 07, 2007 07:32:18 UTC

by Dave

Handling form data like this: http://www.briankotek.com/blog/index.cfm/2007/9/4/Implicit-Creation-of-Arrays-and-Structures-from-Form-Fields It would be really neat to be able to pass arrays and structs based on the input names. -Dave

Sep 07, 2007 12:29:40 UTC

by Luis Majano

That is very interesting Dave, it could be a great addition to the beanFactory as an implicit manipulation. Maybe a setting in your application that activates complex form fields. Do you think that having a setting to turn this ON/OFF would be a good idea?

Sep 07, 2007 20:46:34 UTC

by Dave

You would need to have a on/off setting I would think or it would break backwards-compatibility. -Dave

Sep 08, 2007 11:20:05 UTC

by Dave

Having had sometime to think on it... I would think that add a new function or argument to the event scope might be better then an on/off setting... Such as: event.getCollection('Implicit') or event.getImplicitCollection that way it wouldn't be an all or nothing thing and you could use it when the situation suited you. -Dave

Recent Entries

Ortus Content Digest for week of August 12th

Ortus Content Digest for week of August 12th

It's August 12th... what has Ortus been publishing this week? We have the CFML News Podcast, some CFCasts and YouTube Videos, lots of Ortus and ITB Blog Posts. We have a lot more planned for next week as well.

Gavin Pickin
Gavin Pickin
August 12, 2022
Want native Redis Support in Lucee/CFML? Ortus Redis Extension v2.0.0 Released!

Want native Redis Support in Lucee/CFML? Ortus Redis Extension v2.0.0 Released!

We are very excited to bring you another release for our Redis Lucee Extension. This is a major release spawning research of over 9 months. We have done great strides in this new extension to not only bring you the best scaling capabilities via Redis, but also now to introduce to the CFML world: Real-Time messaging with Redis Pub/Sub! Here is our full release notes in our brand new documentation book: What's New With 2.0.0!

Luis Majano
Luis Majano
August 05, 2022