I think that a standard is arising on the way a method is injected with a request bus. My naming was requestContext and I believe mach-ii and fusebox use both event. I think it would be benefitial for developers for me to change this to event. What are your thoughts on this? This would help if a developer wants to switch from one framework to another or doing a transition, if some of the similar elements shared in an MVC framework can remain the same. I am for changing it to event, but I would like to know you opinions?
Blog
Recent Entries
BoxLang AI v2: Enterprise AI Development Without the Complexity
One Year. 100+ Features. Unlimited Possibilities.
Just one year ago, in March 2024, we launched BoxLang AI 1.0. Today, we're thrilled to announce BoxLang AI v2—a massive leap forward that positions BoxLang as the most powerful and versatile AI framework on the JVM.
Luis Majano
Luis Majano
January
19,
2026
CommandBox: A Smarter Foundation for BoxLang and CFML Workflows
In day-to-day development, some tools simply do their job… and others quietly change the way you work. CommandBox falls into the second category.
It doesn’t replace your editor, framework, or existing applications. Instead, it becomes the common ground where CFML and BoxLang development meet ,giving teams a consistent, reliable way to build, run, and evolve their projects.
Victor Campos
Victor Campos
January
16,
2026
BoxLang v1.9.0 : Production-Ready Stability, Enhanced Lifecycle Management, and Rock-Solid Reliability
Happy New Year! The BoxLang team is excited to announce BoxLang 1.9.0, a significant stability and compatibility release focused on production-readiness thanks to our client migrations and new application deployments. This release also introduces array-based form field parsing conventions, enhanced datasource lifecycle management, improved context handling, and resolves over 50 critical bugs to ensure enterprise-grade reliability for mission-critical applications.
Luis Majano
Luis Majano
January
09,
2026
Add Your Comment
(5)
Feb 27, 2007 14:48:06 UTC
by Sana
Hi Luis, This makes perfect sense, should have some compatibility to other frameworks, at-least vocabulary should be same, so new developers adopt more easily.
Feb 27, 2007 16:20:13 UTC
by Sami Hoda
Can this be a customizable parameter instead?
Feb 27, 2007 18:07:03 UTC
by Luis Majano
I have been going over this and I think the best way is to just call the method and pass the argument. It would then be up to the developer to name the argument. However, the type of the argument will always be: coldbox.system.beans.requestContext How does this sound?
Feb 27, 2007 19:09:58 UTC
by Sami Hoda
I suppose that works. Whenever there is a chance for flexibility, I'm for it.
Mar 05, 2007 19:19:15 UTC
by tony petruzzi
Actually most of the other frameworks let you change the name to whatever you want, they just use event as the default. But you are correct when saying that this would make it alot easier to transition from one framework to another. BTW great work. ColdBox is getting more and more attention lately. I haven't heard anything coming out of the Model-Glue camp.