Blog
Recent Entries
Copy of BoxLang AI 3.4 Blog Series Part 5 : Reasoning Without the Guesswork
Reasoning-capable models have been usable in BoxLang AI for a while. params passes straight through to the provider body, so params: { thinking: { type: "enabled", budget_tokens: 10000 } } for Claude, or params: { reasoning_effort: "high" } for OpenAI, already reached the API. What never worked was reading the reasoning back. It was parsed out on arrival and silently dropped. In 3.4.0, that's fixed, and it's fixed the same way for every provider.
TestBox 7.1 Released : 47 New Ways to Assert, 29 of Them BoxLang-Only
TestBox 7.1.0 is here, and it is the largest single expansion of our assertion and expectation library since TestBox was born.
BoxLang 1.17 Series Part 4 : WriteDump Enhanced!
You call writeDump() on an ORM entity or a very rich class graph . The browser locks up. Thirty seconds later you get a page with forty thousand rows on it, you scroll for a while, you give up, and you go edit your code to dump a sub-key instead. Or worse, you crash the server.
Add Your Comment
(6)
Mar 19, 2013 02:18:17 UTC
by Chris Galli
event.getValue('foo','default'); is not returning as I am understanding it should. I am using
prc.isWidget = event.getValue('arguments.isWidget','false');
or
prc.isWidget = event.getValue('arguments.isWidget',false);
But both return false when my arguments.isWidget value is true
by using
if (arguments.isWidget){prc.isWidget = true;}else{prc.isWidget = false;}; I get the desired behavior.
Am I using this incorrectly?
Mar 19, 2013 02:46:43 UTC
by Brad Wood
You're misunderstanding the event.getValue() method. It is not a general purpose method for accessing any variables in the function but instead a special method specifically for getting values from the request collection. If you do event.getValue('arguments.foo') that is looking for a key called in the request collection struct, or rc[] which is obviously not what you want.
If you want to deal with values coming into the arguments scope, you want to use the regular functionality of CFML to deal with that such as CFParam, structKeyExists() and the like. Only use the methods in the event object to work with the request collection.
Mar 19, 2013 11:57:01 UTC
by Chris Galli
Thanks. That makes sense now. Something more like
param arguments.isWidget = event.getValue('rc.isWidget','false');
pr.isWidegt = arguments.isWidget;
should give the arguments scope priority while gracefully delegating to the rc and then to a default value.
Mar 19, 2013 17:27:41 UTC
by Chris Galli
I discovered I do not need to reference the rc in the event.get value.
<br><br>
param arguments.isWidget = event.getValue('isWidget','false');
<br><br>
prc.isWidget = arguments.isWidget;
Mar 19, 2013 18:00:52 UTC
by Brad Wood
Yep, I was going to comment to that effect but you beat me to it. You only have to pass in the exact name of the variable in the rc to the getValue method. Otherwise it would be looking for rc[] which wouldn't exist.
Think of it this way:
return event.getValue();
is the exact same as:
var rc = event.getCollection();
return rc.foobar;
Mar 19, 2013 18:01:44 UTC
by Brad Wood
Wow, that's annoying that all our line breaks keep getting eaten-- I'm going to put in a ticket for that :)