Blog

Spec Data Binding in TestBox

Luis Majano May 06, 2016

Spread the word

Luis Majano

May 06, 2016

Spread the word


Share your thoughts

This issue has comed up several times in our mailing lists, so why not expand a little with a blog post.

The Problem

Many developers working with TestBox love the BDD approach to spec design. Once they get familiar with the syntax they start getting funky! It is just natural! Since they are coding within a CFC they decide to create dynamic it() or specs by iterating over some type of data collection (queries,arrays,structs). The first iteration of the code might look like this:

// Complex Example
for( var filePath in files ){

    it("#getFileFromPath(filePath)# should be valid JSON", function() {
        
        var json = fileRead(filePath);
        var isItJson = isJSON(json);
        expect(json).notToBeEmpty();
        expect(isItJson).toBeTrue();
        
        if (isItJson) {
            var data = deserializeJSON(json);
            if (getFileFromPath(filePath) != "index.json") {
                expect(data).toHaveKey("name");
                expect(data).toHaveKey("type");
            }
        }

    });
    
}

The Expectation

Now, you would really expect this to work, and it partially does. What you will see is that only the last binding of the iteration works. This is due to the fact that you are iterating and creating closures at runtime. The problem is that closures rely on its environment when executed, not when defined. So in reality, once TestBox executes these closures for evaluation purposes, the last filePath is the one used, since that is the contents of the variable at the time of the execution of the closure, NOT the definition of the closure.

I know, I know, this is really hurting your brain. That's ok. You are getting funky, doesn't mean it is always easy. Anyways, thankfully, TestBox provides a workaround so you can actually bind the spec with runtime definitions so your closures can actually take the right data.

The Solution

The solutions is to use spec data binding in TestBox. Each closure that defines the it() spec, accepts a data argument which is a structure.

it( title="", data={}, body=function( data ){} );

This is passed by TestBox automatically for you. All you have to do is bind it. You do this by passing another argument to the it() spec called data. This now allows you to update your code to the following:

// Complex Example. Let's iterate over a bunch of files and create dynamic specs
for( var filePath in files ){

  it( 
    title="#getFileFromPath( filePath )# should be valid JSON", 
    // pass in a struct of data to the spec for later evaluation
    data = { filePath = filePath },
    // the spec closure accepts the data for later evaluation
    function( data ) {
      var json = fileRead( data.filePath );
      var isItJson = isJSON( json );

      expect( json ).notToBeEmpty();
      expect( isItJson ).toBeTrue();

      if( isItJson ){
          var jsonData = deserializeJSON(json);
          if( getFileFromPath( filePath ) != "index.json"){
              expect( jsonData ).toHaveKey( "name" );
              expect( jsonData ).toHaveKey( "type" );
          }
      }

  });
  
}

Now you can generate dynamic specs and bind them accordingly at runtime! Enjoy!

Add Your Comment

Recent Entries

BoxLang AI v2: Enterprise AI Development Without the Complexity

BoxLang AI v2: Enterprise AI Development Without the Complexity

One Year. 100+ Features. Unlimited Possibilities.

Just one year ago, in March 2024, we launched BoxLang AI 1.0. Today, we're thrilled to announce BoxLang AI v2—a massive leap forward that positions BoxLang as the most powerful and versatile AI framework on the JVM.

Luis Majano
Luis Majano
January 19, 2026
CommandBox: A Smarter Foundation for BoxLang and CFML Workflows

CommandBox: A Smarter Foundation for BoxLang and CFML Workflows

In day-to-day development, some tools simply do their job… and others quietly change the way you work. CommandBox falls into the second category.

It doesn’t replace your editor, framework, or existing applications. Instead, it becomes the common ground where CFML and BoxLang development meet ,giving teams a consistent, reliable way to build, run, and evolve their projects.

Victor Campos
Victor Campos
January 16, 2026
BoxLang v1.9.0 : Production-Ready Stability, Enhanced Lifecycle Management, and Rock-Solid Reliability

BoxLang v1.9.0 : Production-Ready Stability, Enhanced Lifecycle Management, and Rock-Solid Reliability

Happy New Year! The BoxLang team is excited to announce BoxLang 1.9.0, a significant stability and compatibility release focused on production-readiness thanks to our client migrations and new application deployments. This release also introduces array-based form field parsing conventions, enhanced datasource lifecycle management, improved context handling, and resolves over 50 critical bugs to ensure enterprise-grade reliability for mission-critical applications.

Luis Majano
Luis Majano
January 09, 2026